In our recent four-part series (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4) we discussed calculating the total cost of buying vs. renting in order to determine which was the better financial decision.
I have had several great comments and suggestions both on the site and via e-mail. These comments focused on 1) clarifying the tax deductibility of real estate taxes and mortgage interest, 2) including rental increases, and 3) identifying the ultimate online calculator for the buying vs. renting comparison. We will discuss these further below:
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Appreciation and the Total Cost of Buying vs. Renting - Part 4 of 4
This is Part 4 of our 4-part series in toward establishing a methodology for determining whether renting or owning is more financially advantageous. Part 1 can be found here. Part 2 can be found here. Part 3 can be found here. In Part 4, we will be discussing Appreciation and Transaction Costs and working though some specific examples of calculating the cost of renting vs. owning. Part 4 starts below:
Equity and Financing Costs - Buying vs. Renting - Part 3 of 4
This is Part 3 of our 4-part series in toward establishing a methodology for determining whether renting or owning is more financially advantageous. Part 1 can be found here. Part 2 can be found here. In Part 3, we will be discussing the Equity and Financing costs associated with owning a house. Part 3 starts below:
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Ownership Costs - Buying vs. Renting - Part 2 of 4
This is Part 2 of our 4-part series in toward establishing a methodology for determining whether renting or owning is more financially advantageous. Part 1 can be found here. In Part 2, we will be discussing the Ownership costs associated with owning a house. Part 2 starts below:
Monday, February 8, 2010
The Varied Housing Market - Buying vs. Renting - Part 1 of 4
In a recent comment, an associate posed the following quandry:
I think many associates erroneously think that renting a place to live is always throwing money away, while buying a house is always good, not understanding that they're investing (or "investing") on borrowed money in an asset that may not appreciate it at all.This is a question that I get asked a lot. Although at first it seems like a simple question, there are actually several issues wrapped up in the comparison of renting vs. buying. We will unpack and examine these issues and develop a formula for making a direct financial comparison in this 4-part series (it is just too big for one post). In Part 1, I will review that the housing market varies widely geographically and that any determination of ownership vs. renting really relies on your local factors. Part 1 starts below:
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Efficient Charitable Donations Can Earn You $300K For Retirement
In this recent post about the book Debt Is Slavery, we touched on the author's proclaimation that possessions are really a prison - that just about everything that you own costs money, time, and peace of mind. However, the Giant Marketing Machine (GMM) as the author calls it, is out to convince us that we need more and more "stuff" - and that only through "stuff" can we achieve happiness. The author advocated "putting stuff back into circulation" by selling it or donating it and taking the write-off on your taxes. This aspect may also be particularly relevant right now as people being preparing their taxes.
However, I have noticed that people, especially some lawyers, just don't want to let things go or donate them because they feel like they are not getting a good "deal" on the exchange. For example, they don't think that recouping 33% (or 28% or 35%) of the fair market value by donating the item is a "fair price" or that is does not match the emotional value that they assign to the item.
Although the decision to donate or sell an item seems like a straightforward transaction, there are actually some financial aspects that might not be immediately apparent, but can be valuable to consider. These aspects could actually have a financial impact worth several multiples of the fair market value. More on this below.
However, I have noticed that people, especially some lawyers, just don't want to let things go or donate them because they feel like they are not getting a good "deal" on the exchange. For example, they don't think that recouping 33% (or 28% or 35%) of the fair market value by donating the item is a "fair price" or that is does not match the emotional value that they assign to the item.
Although the decision to donate or sell an item seems like a straightforward transaction, there are actually some financial aspects that might not be immediately apparent, but can be valuable to consider. These aspects could actually have a financial impact worth several multiples of the fair market value. More on this below.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
"Closed" Mutual Fund vs. "Closed End" Mutual Fund
One thing that I see a lot is that there are certain investment products that are marketed (and are consequently well-known) and that there are other investment products that are not marketed, or are marketed much less (and consequently are not very well-known at all.) Unfortunately, in many situations the less-marketed investment product may actually be the better choice for some investors. First, a note - this is not investment advice, just educational advice.
In this regard, I have had at least 3 lawyers in the past month confuse a "Closed Mutual Fund" with a "Closed-End Mutual Fund." That's unfortunate because closed-end mutual funds can often provide an investor with substantially better returns - as we will discuss more below.
In this regard, I have had at least 3 lawyers in the past month confuse a "Closed Mutual Fund" with a "Closed-End Mutual Fund." That's unfortunate because closed-end mutual funds can often provide an investor with substantially better returns - as we will discuss more below.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)